FlightWay / Careers / Aerospace Engineers

Engineering & Science

Aerospace Engineers

Perform engineering duties in designing, constructing, and testing aircraft, missiles, and spacecraft.

Sector: Engineering & Science
Preparation: Zone 4 — considerable preparation needed
O*NET code: 17-2011.00

What you'll actually do

The activities O*NET rates highest for this occupation, most important first. Numbers are out of 100.

Working with Computers

central to the job — rated 97/100 for importance.
Processing Information

central to the job — rated 89/100 for importance.
Analyzing Data or Information

central to the job — rated 88/100 for importance.
Making Decisions and Solving Problems

central to the job — rated 87/100 for importance.
Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events

a major part of the work — rated 84/100 for importance.
Getting Information

a major part of the work — rated 84/100 for importance.

Perform engineering duties in designing, constructing, and testing aircraft, missiles, and spacecraft. May conduct basic and applied research to evaluate adaptability of materials and equipment to aircraft design and manufacture. May recommend improvements in testing equipment and techniques.

What it takes

Two numbers per line: the level the work expects, and how important it is to doing the job well. Both are O*NET ratings, already on a 0–100 scale.

Skills

Critical Thinking

Needed at a high level (66/100), and rated 78/100 for importance.
Science

Needed at a high level (73/100), and rated 75/100 for importance.
Reading Comprehension

Needed at a high level (71/100), and rated 75/100 for importance.
Operations Analysis

Needed at a high level (71/100), and rated 72/100 for importance.
Mathematics

Needed at a high level (68/100), and rated 72/100 for importance.

Knowledge

Engineering and Technology

Needed at expert level (87/100), and rated 94/100 for importance.
Mathematics

Needed at expert level (80/100), and rated 81/100 for importance.
Design

Needed at expert level (77/100), and rated 78/100 for importance.
Physics

Needed at a high level (69/100), and rated 76/100 for importance.

Abilities

Written Comprehension

Needed at a high level (73/100), and rated 78/100 for importance.
Deductive Reasoning

Needed at a high level (68/100), and rated 75/100 for importance.
Inductive Reasoning

Needed at a high level (61/100), and rated 75/100 for importance.
Problem Sensitivity

Needed at a solid working level (59/100), and rated 75/100 for importance.

How people get in

O*NET places this occupation in Zone 4 — considerable preparation needed. That is a statement about what employers typically require, not a rule about you.

Education

A four-year bachelor's degree is the usual entry ticket.

Experience

Two to four years of related work, internships or research on top of the degree.

Training

Most of the learning happens before you are hired, not after.

What it pays

These are typical engineering compensation bands by employer tier — sector-level figures, not a measured salary for Aerospace Engineers specifically. Treat them as the shape of the market, then check a real posting for the number.

SpaceX · NVIDIA · Boeing

$120k – $200k+

Manufacturing Corps

$85k – $140k

Local Engineering Firms

$65k – $110k

How the work tends to run

Each line below is read off a single O*NET activity rating for this occupation — named, so you can disagree with it.

Most of the day happens at a screen.From “Working with Computers”
You own decisions rather than execute someone else’s.From “Making Decisions and Solving Problems”
There is real room to invent — the answer is not in a manual.From “Thinking Creatively”

How FlightWay scores your fit against this

No black box. Here is the whole method, factor by factor.

1. You answer a short quiz: Your answers build a profile across the same 161 O*NET dimensions this page is describing — skills, knowledge, abilities and work activities. Same axes, so the comparison is like-for-like.
2. We correlate the two profiles: Fit is a mean-centered cosine — a correlation between the SHAPE of your profile and the shape of Aerospace Engineers. Centering matters: raw similarity between any two occupations sits at 0.70–0.85 because all work shares a common profile, so without it every career would look like a match.
3. The number you see is personality fit only: "Would I want this work" and "am I ready for this work" are different questions, and averaging them answers neither. So readiness — what your résumé, coursework and projects prove — is scored separately and shown next to fit, never blended into it.
4. Every factor is visible: You can open any match and see which dimensions pushed it up and which pulled it down. If you disagree with the number, you can see exactly where it came from.

More in Engineering & Science

See every Engineering & Science career →

See your fit for Aerospace Engineers

Ten questions, about 90 seconds. You get your match against Aerospace Engineers and 782+ other real careers — with the reasoning shown.

Take the quiz Open in FlightWay

Occupational data on this page comes from the O*NET 30.3 Database, published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). O*NET is a registered trademark of USDOL/ETA. FlightWay is not endorsed by, and USDOL/ETA is not responsible for, anything built on that data — see our terms. What is ours is the comparison, the score and the plan.