FlightWay / Careers / Forest and Conservation Technicians

Engineering & Science

Forest and Conservation Technicians

Provide technical assistance regarding the conservation of soil, water, forests, or related natural resources.

Sector: Engineering & Science
Preparation: Zone 3 — medium preparation needed
O*NET code: 19-4071.00

What you'll actually do

The activities O*NET rates highest for this occupation, most important first. Numbers are out of 100.

Operating Vehicles, Mechanized Devices, or Equipment

central to the job — rated 85/100 for importance.
Making Decisions and Solving Problems

a major part of the work — rated 83/100 for importance.
Communicating with Supervisors, Peers, or Subordinates

a major part of the work — rated 81/100 for importance.
Establishing and Maintaining Interpersonal Relationships

a major part of the work — rated 79/100 for importance.
Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events

a major part of the work — rated 78/100 for importance.
Organizing, Planning, and Prioritizing Work

a major part of the work — rated 77/100 for importance.

Provide technical assistance regarding the conservation of soil, water, forests, or related natural resources. May compile data pertaining to size, content, condition, and other characteristics of forest tracts under the direction of foresters, or train and lead forest workers in forest propagation and fire prevention and suppression. May assist conservation scientists in managing, improving, and protecting rangelands and wildlife habitats.

What it takes

Two numbers per line: the level the work expects, and how important it is to doing the job well. Both are O*NET ratings, already on a 0–100 scale.

Skills

Active Listening

Needed at a solid working level (54/100), and rated 69/100 for importance.
Critical Thinking

Needed at a solid working level (48/100), and rated 69/100 for importance.
Reading Comprehension

Needed at a solid working level (54/100), and rated 60/100 for importance.
Speaking

Needed at a solid working level (50/100), and rated 56/100 for importance.
Judgment and Decision Making

Needed at a solid working level (48/100), and rated 56/100 for importance.

Knowledge

Public Safety and Security

Needed at a solid working level (52/100), and rated 70/100 for importance.
English Language

Needed at a solid working level (56/100), and rated 67/100 for importance.
Customer and Personal Service

Needed at a solid working level (57/100), and rated 63/100 for importance.
Law and Government

Needed at a solid working level (47/100), and rated 61/100 for importance.

Abilities

Oral Comprehension

Needed at a solid working level (55/100), and rated 69/100 for importance.
Oral Expression

Needed at a solid working level (55/100), and rated 69/100 for importance.
Problem Sensitivity

Needed at a solid working level (54/100), and rated 69/100 for importance.
Information Ordering

Needed at a solid working level (50/100), and rated 69/100 for importance.

How people get in

O*NET places this occupation in Zone 3 — medium preparation needed. That is a statement about what employers typically require, not a rule about you.

Education

Vocational training, an associate degree, or equivalent on-the-job experience.

Experience

One to two years of related experience is typical.

Training

Employers expect you to arrive with the core skill already.

What it pays

These are typical science compensation bands by employer tier — sector-level figures, not a measured salary for Forest and Conservation Technicians specifically. Treat them as the shape of the market, then check a real posting for the number.

Pfizer · Nat"l Labs · MIT

$110k – $200k

Biotech & Pharma Mid

$90k – $160k

Startups & Academia

$65k – $110k

How the work tends to run

Each line below is read off a single O*NET activity rating for this occupation — named, so you can disagree with it.

The work is physical — you are on your feet and handling things, not sitting still.From “Performing General Physical Activities”
Long-running relationships carry the work; the same people come back.From “Establishing and Maintaining Interpersonal Relationships”
Part of the job is other people’s output, not only your own.From “Coordinating the Work and Activities of Others”
You own decisions rather than execute someone else’s.From “Making Decisions and Solving Problems”
Rules and standards are checkable and someone checks them.From “Evaluating Information to Determine Compliance with Standards”

How FlightWay scores your fit against this

No black box. Here is the whole method, factor by factor.

1. You answer a short quiz: Your answers build a profile across the same 161 O*NET dimensions this page is describing — skills, knowledge, abilities and work activities. Same axes, so the comparison is like-for-like.
2. We correlate the two profiles: Fit is a mean-centered cosine — a correlation between the SHAPE of your profile and the shape of Forest and Conservation Technicians. Centering matters: raw similarity between any two occupations sits at 0.70–0.85 because all work shares a common profile, so without it every career would look like a match.
3. The number you see is personality fit only: "Would I want this work" and "am I ready for this work" are different questions, and averaging them answers neither. So readiness — what your résumé, coursework and projects prove — is scored separately and shown next to fit, never blended into it.
4. Every factor is visible: You can open any match and see which dimensions pushed it up and which pulled it down. If you disagree with the number, you can see exactly where it came from.

More in Engineering & Science

See every Engineering & Science career →

See your fit for Forest and Conservation Technicians

Ten questions, about 90 seconds. You get your match against Forest and Conservation Technicians and 782+ other real careers — with the reasoning shown.

Take the quiz Open in FlightWay

Occupational data on this page comes from the O*NET 30.3 Database, published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). O*NET is a registered trademark of USDOL/ETA. FlightWay is not endorsed by, and USDOL/ETA is not responsible for, anything built on that data — see our terms. What is ours is the comparison, the score and the plan.